Motivating High Performance
This paper exhibits how individuals can motivate high performance with the assistance of the nominal group technique. This approach is effective in conducting plenary sessions to facilitate sharing of information, and enhance key priorities. The nominal group technique is a suitable approach that fulfills decisions, timing, and inputs to satisfy the group.
The nominal group technique or NGT is a process that solves problems in a group. It incorporates steps that involve ways to identify the problem, generate solution and make decisions. This approach is effective in groups that vary with sizes, and need to make quick decisions. It involves different tallying methods that allow each group member to give perception of their solution using a short explanation. Facilitators encourage the discussion and sharing of reasons in relation to choices given by the members of their groups (Moore, 2004). This plays a significant role of locating a common ground, and plurality of approaches and ideas.
The NGT motivates high performance when it allows diversity through creation of hybrid ideas. In this approach, they rank solutions and the one with the highest vote remain in the final position. This technique consists of variations that determine the how individuals use it (Cook, 2009). For instance, nominal group technique is effective in identifying areas and strengths that require development. The design of this technique is to encourage each member to contribute their ideas, and avoid situations where others dominate the discussion. NGT plays a significant role of enhancing creative contributions, which increases production and satisfaction in the group.
In this case, the paper reflects on meeting session plan concerning the community building, which is almost finished. First, the goal of this session is to identify themes and patterns, which can be used to plan the actions to complete the community building (Ulschak, 2001).
The nominal group technique is effective in achieving this goal. It involves a facilitator to guide the group, and a step-to-step process to complete the plan. For effective participation, team members need to function together by engaging in discussions, and contributing ideas that will lead to an ultimate solution. In relation to the nominal group technique, there are specific steps and tasks that need to be incorporated in order to achieve the goals (Coke, 2007).
For instance, if the group is small, it will require fifteen or few members to fulfill the steps while working as a whole. In this case, members will fall under five small groups where they will all function together. The next step will require members in each group to contribute their ideas concerning the completion of the community building session. During this stage, the group will have a task of formulating a discussion question the facilitator reads to ensure that all members understand (Moore, 2004). The next step requires individuals to work alone and gather ideas with help of a flip chart, which is visible to everyone. The facilitator guide members in a group to discuss, and clarify their ideas. This results to developing priorities that will narrow down to the final decision.
The task will be to discuss plans that will assist in completing the community building sessions. Each step or task will require a maximum of two minutes, appropriate voting mechanism that will incorporate facilitators (Clark, 2007). They will count votes of each idea and the highest number qualifies for the final plan. The outcome reveals final decision and plan, which group will present to the next level, to complete the community building session.
Clark, D. (2007). Motivating to win!: how to create, inspire and motivate a high performance. Liskeard: Exposure.
Coke, J. G., & Moore, C. M. (2007). Guide for leaders using nominal group technique. Columbus: Academy for Contemporary Problems.
Cook, S. (2009). The effective manager management skills for high performance. Ely, Cambridgeshire, U.K.: IT Governance Pub..
Moore, C. M. (2004). Group techniques for idea building (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
The Use of Nominal Group Process as a planning tool. (2009). Hyattsville, Md.: U.S. Health Resources Administration.
Ulschak, F. L., Nathanson, L., & Gillan, P. G. (2001). Small group problem solving: an aid to organizational effectiveness. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
MOTIVATING HIGH PERFORMANCE 4
Running Head: MOTIVATING HIGH PERFORMANCE 1